It's interesting to think about the allergic reaction many have to rituals in the church. Many Christians are annoyed with repetition in worship. They judge it as dead or worse, legalistic. (The irony is every church engages in ritual, some just make it feel more informal than others.)
Of course much of this criticism comes from the fact that we have embraced expressive individualism as a virtue, the belief that what really matters is how I feel and how I express myself. Therefore, all worship is judged by whether or not it is sincere, sincerely felt or experienced, which creates an endless search for novelty; hence our avoidance of ritual. (James Smith, Imagining the Kingdom: How Worship Works).
However, we need to recognize the power that repetitive rituals play in our life. We use them constantly. Athletic teams use expressions to shape culture and increase motivation. Corporate culture embrace slogans to be memorized and repeated. In America we sing the National Anthem before sporting events. All of these activities do things to us. They work as filters, by creating focus, telling us what is not important; and at the same time, they inculcate values.
In fact recently, I found myself dreaming of coaching. I began to put together a series of values that I would instill in my players. I envisioned each month highlighting a value, celebrating it, and holding my players accountable to it. Example: I would want my high school team to learn to be thankful--to be thankful that they are on a team, to be thankful for one another, and to play with gratitude and joy. I would instill this virtue through ritual and slogans: "Together on me, gratitude on three, 1-2-3--GRATITUDE!"
As I travel down this reverie, I realize that the same idea applies to the church. If we are doing worship well, we will embrace rituals that shape our desires. Our worship should include repetitive rituals that are beautiful, deep and theologically sound. Communion is an example. When we participate in communion, it should celebrate God's work on the cross in Christ; it should be accompanied by good prayers, song and historical creeds. Week after week, this ritual begins to shape us. The same could be said for how we gather and what happens when we are dismissed. The "flow" of worship should connect us to God's movement in history of calling, saving, setting apart and sending a people.
Week after week, these rituals will create disciples for the kingdom. So dear church, let us worship with intentionality, boldness and humility.
Peace.
Thursday, June 22, 2017
Tuesday, June 6, 2017
Jesus, Not the Church?
There is a statement that has almost become a cliche. You hear it mostly in settings where people want to talk about church growth. Or when pastors want to argue the church needs to change. It's statement I've probably used myself, unfortunately. What many church leaders claim is that we live in a culture that likes Jesus but doesn't like the church.
Is it that simple? Does our culture really like Jesus but can't stand the church? The conclusion is Jesus is not the problem, but the church is. If only the church can change, then all will be well. Granted, there is some truth to the fact that churches often misrepresent the reign of peace in Jesus. That being stated, I doubt we can conclude that the church is always the problem because everyone likes Jesus.
To challenge the simplicity of this idea, we can ask, What Jesus does our culture like? Is it the Jesus who stands against greed in all of its forms? I'm not sure American culture would naturally embrace the Jesus of Luke who speaks several times about the dangers of money and possessions.
Is our culture enamored with the Jesus who calls us to love our enemies? I doubt it. Learning to love enemies is not natural and therefore not easily embraced.
Does American culture like the Jesus who calls for repentance--the Jesus who is not offering a spirituality but new way of life shaped by a cruciform discipleship? Does our culture like the idea of the cross? Suffering? Again, I doubt it.
You see, the assumption most church growth experts make is that Jesus meets our deepest needs. He solves our problems. He makes our lives easier. Everyone will love him. All we need to do is get rid of all the noise of religious activity, offer Jesus and the world will come to church again. Lost in this naive narrative is the reality of sin and evil from which Jesus longs to deliver us.
Another way to state the matter is to recognize that our culture is probably not any less idolatrous than the one that nailed Jesus to a tree. We live in a time when greed, violence and the narrative success above all else dominate our lives. These idols do not go down without a fight.
So Jesus very well might be the problem. Jesus very well might be a hinderance to our church growth. In some settings, Jesus will be embraced and the church will be loved; in other settings, he will be rejected and the church will be hated.
Regardless, we are called to witness to the Son who has rescued us from this present evil age and has called us to into the light of God's new creation in Christ. This work is not easy. We might grow numerically. We might shrink. We might be loved. We might be hated. The results are beyond us and out of our control. So we are called to a full faithfulness to Jesus and his way. Nothing more, nothing less.
Is it that simple? Does our culture really like Jesus but can't stand the church? The conclusion is Jesus is not the problem, but the church is. If only the church can change, then all will be well. Granted, there is some truth to the fact that churches often misrepresent the reign of peace in Jesus. That being stated, I doubt we can conclude that the church is always the problem because everyone likes Jesus.
To challenge the simplicity of this idea, we can ask, What Jesus does our culture like? Is it the Jesus who stands against greed in all of its forms? I'm not sure American culture would naturally embrace the Jesus of Luke who speaks several times about the dangers of money and possessions.
Is our culture enamored with the Jesus who calls us to love our enemies? I doubt it. Learning to love enemies is not natural and therefore not easily embraced.
Does American culture like the Jesus who calls for repentance--the Jesus who is not offering a spirituality but new way of life shaped by a cruciform discipleship? Does our culture like the idea of the cross? Suffering? Again, I doubt it.
You see, the assumption most church growth experts make is that Jesus meets our deepest needs. He solves our problems. He makes our lives easier. Everyone will love him. All we need to do is get rid of all the noise of religious activity, offer Jesus and the world will come to church again. Lost in this naive narrative is the reality of sin and evil from which Jesus longs to deliver us.
Another way to state the matter is to recognize that our culture is probably not any less idolatrous than the one that nailed Jesus to a tree. We live in a time when greed, violence and the narrative success above all else dominate our lives. These idols do not go down without a fight.
So Jesus very well might be the problem. Jesus very well might be a hinderance to our church growth. In some settings, Jesus will be embraced and the church will be loved; in other settings, he will be rejected and the church will be hated.
Regardless, we are called to witness to the Son who has rescued us from this present evil age and has called us to into the light of God's new creation in Christ. This work is not easy. We might grow numerically. We might shrink. We might be loved. We might be hated. The results are beyond us and out of our control. So we are called to a full faithfulness to Jesus and his way. Nothing more, nothing less.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)